Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Is the popular theory of origin of life wrong...Khushdeep

Scientists have found components of DNA, the building blocks of life on Earth, in meteorites, a discovery they say confirms the theory that at least some of the materials needed to make early life forms came to our planet from space.


In the NASA-funded study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists used advanced mass spectrometry instruments to scan 11 organic-rich meteorites called carbonaceous chondrites and one ureilite, a very rare meteorite with a different chemical composition.
They found three nucleobases -- purine, 6,8-diaminopurine and 2,6-diaminopurine -- that are widely distributed in carbonaceous chondrites and which are "rare or absent in terrestrial biology," said the researchers.



The scientists found no significant concentrations of the trio in soil and ice samples near where the meteorites landed, LiveScience reported.



Past research had revealed a range of building blocks of life in meteorites, such as the amino acids that make up proteins. Space rocks just like these may have been a vital source of the organic compounds that gave rise to life on Earth.



This was the first time all but two of these meteorites had been analysed for nucleobases, the researchers said.


"People have been finding nucleobases in meteorites for about 50 years now, and have been trying to figure out if they are of biological origin or not," said study co-author Jim Cleaves, of the Carnegie Institution of Washington.



"Finding nucleobase compounds not typically found in Earth's biochemistry strongly supports an extraterrestrial origin.



"This shows us that meteorites may have been molecular tool kits, which provided the essential building blocks for life on Earth," Cleaves was quoted as saying to SPACE.com.



The analytical techniques probed the mass and other features of the molecules to identify the presence of extraterrestrial nucleobases and see that they apparently did not come from the surrounding area.
Two of the carbonaceous chondrites contained a diverse array of nucleobases and structurally similar compounds known as nucleobase analogs.



Intriguingly, three of these nucleobase analogs are very rare in Earth biology, and were not found in soil and ice samples from the areas near where the meteorites were collected at the parts-per-billion limits of their detection techniques, the researchers said.



"At the start of this project, it looked like the nucleobases in these meteorites were terrestrial contamination these results were a very big surprise for me," said study co-author Michael Callahan, an astrobiologist at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.



Lab experiments showed that chemical reactions of ammonia and cyanide, compounds that are common in space, could generate nucleobases and nucleobase analogs very similar to those found in the carbonaceous chondrites.



However, the relative abundances of these molecules between the experiments and the meteorites differed, which might be due to further chemical and thermal influences from space.



The findings suggest the earliest forms of life on Earth may have been assembled from materials delivered to Earth by meteorites, the researchers added.


(Source...PTI)

Monday, 8 August 2011

India For Corruption...Khushdeep

 

"Bhrashtachar" A Street play

A part of India Against Corruption Campaign.
The Play directed by Arvind Gaur, Performed by Asmita Theatre Group Actors.
Actors-Shilpi Marwaha,Shiv Chauhan,Imran Zahid,Gaurav Mishra,Rahul Khanna,Himanshu Maggu,Palak Bhutani,Vartika Tiwari,Ishwak Singh,Suraj Singh,Himanshu Katara,Anish Kumar Maht...o, Saurabh Pal,Narendra Thakur,Pankaj Shandilya,Aj Parikh,Manoj Yadav,Sachin Saxena,Pradeep Awasthi,Tarun kumar,Punkaj Datta,Amit Dhaiya,Kumar Vaibhav,Renu Kashyap, Abhishek Pandey,Manu Chaudhary,Smita Lal,Aparna Singh,Rahul Sharma,Rohit Vaid,Shivani Sinha,Anamika Singh,Manju Shah, Priyanshu, Jitendra Badana,Amrita Chakraborty,Manish, Prasant,Ankit,Prateek Sharma, Siddharth Tripathi, Harsh Arora,Aditya,Vivek Sharma, Vineet,Praveen Kumar,Payal Tarafdar and other.


Saturday, 6 August 2011

Mr Churchill, You were right 64 years back...Khushdeep

WHAT THE BRITISHERS DIDN’T SUCCEED IN DOING, WE ARE EXCELLING IN!!





Sir Winston Churchill wrote 64 years ago: "Power will go to the hands of rascals, rogues, freebooters; all Indian leaders will be of low caliber & men of straw. They will have sweet tongues & silly hearts. They will fight amongst themselves for power & India will be lost in political squabbles. A day would come when even air & water would be taxed in India." We are indeed an incredible NATION; we have worked very hard and we have indeed proved him right.....

Releasing Shortly Multi Billion $ Small Budget Film

"LOOT LO INDIA"
Producer-Director : IFC (India For Corruption)
Lead Roles : Manmohan Singh, Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Sushma Swaraj, Sharad Pawar

Villian : Indian Public
Supporting cast : B.S.Yediyurrappa,  Ashok Chavan, A Raja , D Maran , Kanimohzi & Kalmadi

Comedy : Lalu Prasad Yadav, Digvijay Singh, Amar Singh, Nitin Gadkari

Financiers : Corporate Houses, Reddy Brothers (Bellary Fame)
Script : Karunanidhi

Inaction : Indian Police,

Stunts; CBI, ED, NIA

PRO : Neera Radia

Noise ; M Tiwari, A Singhvi. Parkash Javdekar, Shahnawaz Hussain, Sanjay Raut

Media Partners : Sun TV, Kalaignar TV

Banking Partners : Hasan Ali, S Balwa

Shot at locales in Switzerland, Cayman Islands , Tihar,
Tickets printed by TELGI
DEAR FRIENDS IF YOU KNOW SOME POLITICAL PERSONS PLEASE REQUEST THEM TO SEE THIS. THEY NEED TO BE CONGRATULATED FOR THE PAINS THEY HAVE TAKEN IN THESE 64 YEARS TO PROVE SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL CORRECT

Friday, 5 August 2011

Could Lab-Grown Sperm Help Infertile Men?

Could Lab-Grown Sperm Help Infertile Men?
 In most mammals, it takes more than month to complete the complex, multistage process of making sperm — which is why scientists have had trouble growing sperm cells in the lab. But now Japanese researchers report success, using testicular tissue from baby mice to make sperm in a lab dish and then producing healthy offspring.


With further study into the safety and efficacy of the technique in human cells, it may potentially lead to treatments for some men who suffer from infertility problems. A better understanding of how sperm form could also help improve diagnosis and treatment of male infertility.



Researchers from Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine in Japan published their mouse-study findings this week in Nature, noting that they hoped their discovery would eventually be able to help humans. The BBC described the scientists' technique:





Rather than working with individual cells, the team in Japan used fragments of testes. It is like starting with a whole segment of an orange rather than just the juice.

The fragments were then bathed in nutrients and sperm production was maintained for more than two months.
The findings suggest that testicular tissue can be frozen and saved for later use — a potential advance that could help preserve fertility in certain patients, such as young boys facing cancer treatment. Adult cancer patients can freeze sperm before starting chemotherapy or radiation, but that isn't an option for boys who haven't entered puberty yet.





Experts caution, however, that while the experimental advance is significant, there needs to be much more research before a similar technique could be used in the clinic. "It is important to be cautious because sometimes species-specific differences in biology means that what works for one species does not work in another," Dr. Allan Pacey, a senior lecturer in andrology at the University of Sheffield, told the BBC.



 (Meredith Melnick is a reporter at TIME)



Wednesday, 3 August 2011

Answers Brilliant but marks nil...Khushdeep





Brilliant answers for which a student got 0% marks...




Question no 1...In which battle did Tipu Sultan died ?...
Answer...His last one...


Question no 2....How do you stop acid indigestion ?...
Answer...Stop drinking acid...


Question no 3...Where was the declaration of independence was signed ? ..
Answer...At the bottom of the page...


Question no 4...What is the main reason for divorce ?...
Answer...Marriage..


Keep Smiling, Keep Brilliancy Awaken...

Monday, 1 August 2011

Is cleavage an asset of female anchor...Khushdeep







Day before yesterday, in MINT business daily, It's Editor R. Sukumar wrote a great article on shocking state of female anchors in business channels...Are their figure important criteria for fixing thier salaries and promotions...With all credits to R.Sukumar, this masterpiece should be read by more and more people, specially Media fraternity...


                                                                 A media obsession
-R. Sukumar-
I know some women anchors on business channels. Many of them are smart -- or are on their way to getting there -- and I can’t believe they agree to go along with on-the-edge wardrobe suggestions put forth by their producers :
Cleavage,” he said.
I thought I hadn’t heard him clearly.
He sensed my question even before I asked it.
Big ones, he said, moving his hands out till they were at least 10 inches in front of his chest.
I didn’t want to get technical, so I didn’t point out the obvious, that there was a difference between the two things he had described. His meaning was clear, though. The person, who worked for a business news channel, was telling me why the channel had hired a certain anchor for its morning stock market show.
I didn’t want to hear more though my friend from the channel seemed keen to share with me the unsavoury specifics of what day traders and brokers do when they watch business news channels.
I didn’t pay much heed to what he said till another person, from another business news channel, told me the same story.
She got three times her current salary, for agreeing to leave the top two buttons of her shirt unbuttoned, he said, referring to an anchor who had recently switched channels.
I have more or less reproduced their words as I remember them from our conversations, and I apologize if I have offended the sensibilities of some readers of this paper. Mint remains a family paper.
I was reminded of these conversations in the wake of the coverage papers and channels devoted to Hina Rabbani Khar, the photogenic foreign minister of Pakistan. Even by the standards of the near-saturation coverage any visit by a Pakistani foreign minister to this country receives, this was a bit much.
So, is the media obsessed with looks?
The simple answer to that is: Yes, a lot.
Is the media obsessed with shows of skin?
Yes, a lot.
You do not need to possess an IQ of 130 to figure this out; a casual perusal of newspapers, including some large English-language ones, will throw up a bunch of pictures of women who must be perennially cold given their dress sense, and used entirely out of context. A similar casual run-through of television channels will show, in many channels, young women dressed for a night out and reading the news.
There are some media companies that do not do this. Since this column is, at one level, all about losing friends and offending people, I am going to go ahead and name the good ones. I have not seen any of NDTV’s channels do this, nor Times Now and CNN-IBN. And the business channels are the worst offenders.
Why would they do this?
(Sorry, silly question; let me try again)
A senior editor at a popular US business channel once told me that his company had a simple rule for women anchors: high necks; comfortable hems.
Then, India isn’t the US (although I still can’t understand how respectable media companies can indulge in blatantly exploitative behaviour).
I know some women anchors on business channels. Many of them are smart—or are on their way to getting there—and I can’t believe they agree to go along with on-the-edge wardrobe suggestions put forth by their producers.
After all, you don’t find the men anchoring shows on these channels modelling themselves on actor Hrithik Roshan (the word button probably doesn’t exist in his vocabulary). They are all uniformly dressed soberly, in dark suits, plain shirts and boring ties.


The morning slot is an important one for business channels. Their viewership peaks between 9 and 11 in the morning and then tapers off before peaking, although not to the same level as the morning, in mid-afternoon, around the time the stock markets close. Their viewership also witnesses a small spike, lower than both peaks, in the evening, for prime-time business news. The programming on all channels remains the same during market hours, a mix of stock tips, market moving news, and interviews with in-house or external experts (some of whom are of dubious integrity, but that’s a different story).
Most viewers watch these channels with the mute function engaged; they are interested in the tickers and the stock charts, not what the anchor is saying. And as any level-headed financial adviser will tell anyone who cares to listen, most business channels are aimed at day traders and punters, not long-term investors (shameless plug: read Mint’s personal finance section, Mint Money, for that).
Under the circumstances, it isn’t surprising that the channels choose to differentiate themselves on the basis of how their female anchors look. It isn’t surprising but, in my book at least, it isn’t condonable.


Funny (Part 2)- Indian current affairs...Khushdeep